Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months

From: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months
Date: 2017-05-29 05:06:37
Message-ID: 212e7d62-7790-9d48-64ba-271af712f776@catalyst.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 29/05/17 16:26, Erik Rijkers wrote:

> On 2017-05-29 00:17, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>> On 28/05/17 19:01, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>>
>>> So running in cloud land now...so for no errors - will update.
>>
>> The framework ran 600 tests last night, and I see 3 'NOK' results, i.e
>> 3 failed test runs (all scale 25 and 8 pgbench clients). Given the way
>
> Could you also give the params for the successful runs?

Scale 25, clients 90 and 64, scale 5 clients 90, 64 and 8 (i.e the
defaults in the driver script).
>
> Can you say anything about hardware? (My experience is that older,
> slower, 'worse' hardware makes for more fails.)

It's running in a openstack cloud (so is a libvirt guest): 4 cpus, 4 GB
ram and 2 disks: one for each Postgres instance, both formatted xfs. Hmm
so maybe I should run a VM on my workstation and crank the IOPS limit
way down...in the meantime I'll just let it run :-)
>
>
> Many thanks, by the way. I'm glad that it turns out I'm probably not
> doing something uniquely stupid (although I'm not glad that there
> seems to be a bug, and an elusive one at that)
>
>

Yeah looks like something subtle :-( Hopefully now its out in the open
we'll all figure it together!

regards

Mark

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Jurd 2017-05-29 05:09:49 psql: Activate pager only for height, not width
Previous Message Erik Rijkers 2017-05-29 04:44:20 Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months