From: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months |
Date: | 2017-05-29 05:06:37 |
Message-ID: | 212e7d62-7790-9d48-64ba-271af712f776@catalyst.net.nz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 29/05/17 16:26, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> On 2017-05-29 00:17, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>> On 28/05/17 19:01, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>>
>>> So running in cloud land now...so for no errors - will update.
>>
>> The framework ran 600 tests last night, and I see 3 'NOK' results, i.e
>> 3 failed test runs (all scale 25 and 8 pgbench clients). Given the way
>
> Could you also give the params for the successful runs?
Scale 25, clients 90 and 64, scale 5 clients 90, 64 and 8 (i.e the
defaults in the driver script).
>
> Can you say anything about hardware? (My experience is that older,
> slower, 'worse' hardware makes for more fails.)
It's running in a openstack cloud (so is a libvirt guest): 4 cpus, 4 GB
ram and 2 disks: one for each Postgres instance, both formatted xfs. Hmm
so maybe I should run a VM on my workstation and crank the IOPS limit
way down...in the meantime I'll just let it run :-)
>
>
> Many thanks, by the way. I'm glad that it turns out I'm probably not
> doing something uniquely stupid (although I'm not glad that there
> seems to be a bug, and an elusive one at that)
>
>
Yeah looks like something subtle :-( Hopefully now its out in the open
we'll all figure it together!
regards
Mark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brendan Jurd | 2017-05-29 05:09:49 | psql: Activate pager only for height, not width |
Previous Message | Erik Rijkers | 2017-05-29 04:44:20 | Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months |