| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Reorganize GUC structs |
| Date: | 2025-11-19 07:57:28 |
| Message-ID: | 222481bd-ce00-4957-9789-b56f2398d930@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 14.11.25 12:00, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2025-Nov-12, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>> Well, that's the one, but the code actually looks like this now:
>>
>> while ((i = bms_next_member(atts, i)) >= 0)
>> {
>> attcnt++;
>> if (attcnt > 1)
>> appendStringInfoString(&attsbuf, _(", "));
>>
>> appendStringInfo(&attsbuf, _("\"%s\""), remoterel->attnames[i]);
>> }
>>
>> The catalog entries you are showing appear to be from pre-PG18.
>
> Ah, right.
>
>> There are also similar instances in ExecBuildSlotValueDescription() that are
>> not marked up for gettext but perhaps should be. There might be others, and
>> I would expect more like this to appear over time, as people like to add
>> more detail like this to diagnostics messages.
>
> Sure.
>
>> Do you have a suggestion what kind of comment to attach there?
>
> I would say "This is a separator in a list of entity names." We don't
> need to be specific as to what kind of entity it is, I think.
Ok, committed that way.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2025-11-19 07:58:02 | Re: Consistently use the XLogRecPtrIsInvalid() macro |
| Previous Message | Maciek Sakrejda | 2025-11-19 07:56:24 | Re: Add mode column to pg_stat_progress_vacuum |