Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)
Date: 2001-07-19 04:08:16
Message-ID: 22225.995515696@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> As I mentioned already I'm implementing updatable cursors
> in ODBC and have half done it. If OIDs would be optional
> my trial loses its validity but I would never try another
> implementation.

Could you use CTID instead of OID?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Widenius 2001-07-19 04:08:49 Re: MySQL Gemini code
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-07-19 04:00:53 Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)