Re: Wrong definition of pgwin32_bind.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Wrong definition of pgwin32_bind.
Date: 2016-04-14 14:13:23
Message-ID: 22216.1460643203@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> The third parameter should be int, not int*. It might have been
>> confused with pgwin32_accept.

> Nice catch.

David Rowley reported this a bit earlier.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-04-14 14:55:00 Re: Pglogical questions and problems
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-04-14 14:09:14 Re: \crosstabview fixes