Re: plpgsql temporary table problem

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Geoff Russell <geoff(at)austrics(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: plpgsql temporary table problem
Date: 2002-04-14 16:58:05
Message-ID: 22115.1018803485@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> ... I believe every reference to the TEMP table has
> to be an EXECUTE. I think this will be fixed in 7.3 because the temp
> tables will exist in a separate schema.

No, the separate schema won't help matters a bit.

Plan dependency tracking (to allow us to drop invalidated cached plans)
would help.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-04-14 17:15:44 Re: plpgsql temporary table problem
Previous Message Manuel 2002-04-14 15:18:19 How to Recompile Postgreqsl to increase Function-argument limit??