| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: automatically generating node support functions |
| Date: | 2021-07-26 21:25:27 |
| Message-ID: | 217471.1627334727@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> The first eight patches are to clean up various inconsistencies to make
>> parsing or generation easier.
> Are there any concerns about the patches 0001 through 0008? Otherwise,
> maybe we could get those out of the way.
I looked through those and don't have any complaints (though I just
eyeballed them, I didn't see what a compiler would say). I see
you pushed a couple of them already.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-07-26 21:30:45 | Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers) |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-07-26 21:16:25 | Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers) |