Re: pgsql-server/src backend/bootstrap/Tag: backen ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql-server/src backend/bootstrap/Tag: backen ...
Date: 2003-09-08 02:20:21
Message-ID: 21721.1062987621@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers-win32

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I thought the consensus of the discussion was that this was not
>>> necessary. It sure doesn't strike me as a good idea.

> Also, keep in mind that in the end most folks will be building under
> MinGW using a release tarball, that has those output files. We haven't
> gotten a MinGW release yet, so they have to build all the stuff.

Well, that's a fair argument, but why don't you get Marc to set up
nightly snapshots for the WIN32_DEV branch? That only costs cycles
in the short term. Polluting CVS with updates to derived files will
cost us CVS storage forever.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-09-08 02:30:54 Re: pgsql-server/src backend/bootstrap/Tag: backen ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-08 02:15:33 Re: pgsql-server/src backend/bootstrap/Tag: backen ...

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-09-08 02:30:54 Re: pgsql-server/src backend/bootstrap/Tag: backen ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-08 02:15:33 Re: pgsql-server/src backend/bootstrap/Tag: backen ...