Re: pgsql-server/src backend/bootstrap/Tag: backen ...

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql-server/src backend/bootstrap/Tag: backen ...
Date: 2003-09-08 02:30:54
Message-ID: 20030907233012.M4862@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers-win32

On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> I thought the consensus of the discussion was that this was not
> >>> necessary. It sure doesn't strike me as a good idea.
>
> > Also, keep in mind that in the end most folks will be building under
> > MinGW using a release tarball, that has those output files. We haven't
> > gotten a MinGW release yet, so they have to build all the stuff.
>
> Well, that's a fair argument, but why don't you get Marc to set up
> nightly snapshots for the WIN32_DEV branch? That only costs cycles
> in the short term. Polluting CVS with updates to derived files will
> cost us CVS storage forever.

Easy enough, and done ...

ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/win32_dev

will have it run nighty like the regular snapshot

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-08 02:54:49 Re: pgsql-server/src backend/bootstrap/Tag: backen ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-08 02:20:21 Re: pgsql-server/src backend/bootstrap/Tag: backen ...

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-08 02:54:49 Re: pgsql-server/src backend/bootstrap/Tag: backen ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-08 02:20:21 Re: pgsql-server/src backend/bootstrap/Tag: backen ...