Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)oryx(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, gavin(at)alcove(dot)com(dot)au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql
Date: 2008-09-06 18:58:25
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> ... define
> \ef with no argument as being the command that presents an empty CREATE
> FUNCTION command template to fill in.

No complaints? I'll go make that happen.

What about the general issue that neither \e nor \ef leave you with a
presentation of what's in the query buffer? I haven't studied readline
enough to know if that's fixable.

regards, tom lane

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-09-06 19:09:38 Re: hash index improving v3
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-09-06 18:25:35 Re: pg_dump/pg_restore items