| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump/pg_restore items |
| Date: | 2008-09-06 18:25:35 |
| Message-ID: | 21104.1220725535@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> What is the state of the following items? I'm a little confused about
> whether or not work is being done on them.
> . splitting pg_dump/pg_restore schema dumps into pre-data and post-data
> sections
A patch for that was proposed and rejected in the last fest; I'm not
sure if anyone is trying to bring it up to speed, but it's in the
archives if anyone wants to.
> . parallel pg_restore
I've not heard that anyone has done any work on this.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-09-06 18:58:25 | Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-09-06 18:23:35 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix an oversight in the 8.2 patch that improved mergejoin |