| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Relaxing SSL key permission checks |
| Date: | 2016-02-21 23:58:08 |
| Message-ID: | 21507.1456099088@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> Just to be clear, I'm not really against this patch as-is, but it
> shouldn't be a precedent or limit us from supporting more permissive
> permissions in other areas (or even here) if there are sensible
> use-cases for more permissive permissions.
OK, and to be clear, I'm not against considering other use-cases and
trying to do something appropriate for them. I just reject the idea
that it's unnecessary or inappropriate for us to be concerned about
whether secret-holding files are secure.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thom Brown | 2016-02-22 00:39:10 | Re: Proposal: "Causal reads" mode for load balancing reads without stale data |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2016-02-21 23:18:55 | Re: Proposal: "Causal reads" mode for load balancing reads without stale data |