From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Relaxing SSL key permission checks |
Date: | 2016-02-21 22:18:18 |
Message-ID: | 20160221221818.GU3331@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> writes:
> > The attached patch has successfully been included in the 9.6 Debian
> > package, passed the regression tests there, and I've also done some
> > chmod/chown tests on the filesystem to verify it indeed catches the
> > cases laid out by Tom.
>
> Please add this to the upcoming commitfest. We don't seem to have
> enough consensus to just apply it, but perhaps the review process
> will produce some agreement.
Just to be clear, I'm not really against this patch as-is, but it
shouldn't be a precedent or limit us from supporting more permissive
permissions in other areas (or even here) if there are sensible
use-cases for more permissive permissions.
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2016-02-21 23:02:03 | significant semi join overestimates (with CTEs) |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2016-02-21 22:03:45 | Re: checkpointer continuous flushing - V18 |