Re: Test::More version

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Test::More version
Date: 2021-11-15 19:14:36
Message-ID: 2145933.1637003676@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

=?utf-8?Q?Dagfinn_Ilmari_Manns=C3=A5ker?= <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Based on this, I'm inclined to think we should select 0.98 as the
>> minimum version. Anything later would inconvenience some people.
>> OTOH, it doesn't look like there's any value in promising compatibility
>> with 0.96 instead, especially since I see a couple of subplan-related
>> bug fixes in 0.97 and 0.98 in Test::Simple's changelog.

> FWIW, here's a list of Test::More versions shipped with various Perl
> releases. Since v5.12.0, the version does not change in minor releases.
> ...
> v5.12.0 0.94
> v5.14.0 0.98

Ah-hah, that's a good way to think about it too. There's surely
little reason in worrying about a module version that did not ship
in any Perl release, because what 99.9% of people will have is what
shipped with their Perl release.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2021-11-15 19:15:04 Re: Frontend error logging style
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-11-15 19:11:25 Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson