| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: Core dump with nested CREATE TEMP TABLE |
| Date: | 2015-09-04 15:22:51 |
| Message-ID: | 21413.1441380171@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> After review of all the callers of RelationClearRelation, it seems like
> most of them already have sufficient guards to prevent triggering of the
> Assert. The ones that lack such tests are AtEOXact_cleanup and
> AtEOSubXact_cleanup. So what I'm now thinking is that those should do
> something along the lines of
Specifically, this, which can be shown to mitigate the results of the
problem cases in an otherwise-unpatched build.
regards, tom lane
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| prevent-relcache-assert-failure.patch | text/x-diff | 3.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nikolay Shaplov | 2015-09-04 16:05:11 | Re: pageinspect patch, for showing tuple data |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-09-04 14:58:56 | Re: Fwd: Core dump with nested CREATE TEMP TABLE |