| From: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ... |
| Date: | 2004-02-18 19:19:03 |
| Message-ID: | 213630000.1077131943@lerlaptop-red.iadfw.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
--On Wednesday, February 18, 2004 13:56:14 -0500 Bruce Momjian
<pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> The question is whether we should have a GUC variable to control no
> waiting on locks or add NO WAIT to specific SQL commands.
>
> Does anyone want to vote _against_ the GUC idea for nowait locking. (We
> already have two voting for such a variable.)
>
> If there is no one except Tom, we can continue.
I'm with Tom. Playing with *ALL* locks is just asking for TROUBLE.
(I don't know if I count).
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeremy Smith | 2004-02-18 19:25:19 | Inserting NULL into Integer column |
| Previous Message | Hans-Jürgen Schönig | 2004-02-18 19:15:33 | Re: NO WAIT ... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2004-02-18 19:27:56 | Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ... |
| Previous Message | Hans-Jürgen Schönig | 2004-02-18 19:15:33 | Re: NO WAIT ... |