| From: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ... |
| Date: | 2004-02-18 19:27:56 |
| Message-ID: | 1077132475.18564.404.camel@jester |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> The question is whether we should have a GUC variable to control no
> waiting on locks or add NO WAIT to specific SQL commands.
>
> Does anyone want to vote _against_ the GUC idea for nowait locking. (We
> already have two voting for such a variable.)
I vote against. We got bit by both the regex and the autocommit GUC vars
and this is setting up to cause a similar headache with old code on new
platforms.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2004-02-18 19:43:34 | Re: Inserting NULL into Integer column |
| Previous Message | Jeremy Smith | 2004-02-18 19:25:19 | Inserting NULL into Integer column |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Barry Lind | 2004-02-18 19:44:21 | Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ... |
| Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2004-02-18 19:19:03 | Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ... |