Re: weird hash plan cost, starting with pg10

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: weird hash plan cost, starting with pg10
Date: 2020-04-27 16:26:03
Message-ID: 21177.1588004763@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
> Checking if you're planning to backpatch this ?

Are you speaking of 5c27bce7f et al?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2020-04-27 16:29:58 Re: weird hash plan cost, starting with pg10
Previous Message Robert Haas 2020-04-27 16:24:06 Re: +(pg_lsn, int8) and -(pg_lsn, int8) operators