Re: weird hash plan cost, starting with pg10

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: weird hash plan cost, starting with pg10
Date: 2020-04-27 16:29:58
Message-ID: 20200427162958.GZ28974@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:26:03PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
> > Checking if you're planning to backpatch this ?
>
> Are you speaking of 5c27bce7f et al?

Oops, yes, thanks.

I updated wiki/PostgreSQL_13_Open_Items just now.

--
Justin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2020-04-27 16:33:55 improving basebackup.c's file-reading code
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-04-27 16:26:03 Re: weird hash plan cost, starting with pg10