Re: pg_stat_statements vs. SELECT FOR UPDATE

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements vs. SELECT FOR UPDATE
Date: 2019-01-19 17:02:09
Message-ID: 21151.1547917329@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Does the extension need a version bump for this?

We don't bump its version when we make any other change that affects
its hash calculation. I don't think this could be back-patched,
but Andrew wasn't proposing to do so (IIUC).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2019-01-19 18:13:35 Re: pgsql: Remove references to Majordomo
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-01-19 17:00:30 Re: pg_stat_statements vs. SELECT FOR UPDATE