From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [BUG]: segfault during update |
Date: | 2020-11-10 05:24:21 |
Message-ID: | 2111233.1604985861@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2020-11-08 12:46:44 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In v12 we end up using the junkfilter's output
>> slot, which does not have a sufficiently accurate tupdesc to deal with
>> an on-disk tuple rather than one constructed by the executor.
> I really wonder if we ought to redesign the column default logic to
> really be a property of the Attr, instead of the constraint stuff it is
> now.
Yeah, I don't much like treating it as a constraint either. Not quite
sure that it's worth the work to move it somewhere else, though.
> Is it worth adding Bertrand's testcase to the regression suite in some
> form?
I did add an equivalent test case.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2020-11-10 05:32:24 | [PATCH] TAP test showing that pg_replication_slot_advance() works on standby |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-11-10 05:23:10 | Re: logical streaming of xacts via test_decoding is broken |