Re: Beta time

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Beta time
Date: 2001-09-18 04:40:32
Message-ID: 21044.1000788032@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> I am checking the indexStruct->indisprimary field, but it always resolves to
> false. indisunique works fine. It is a trivial change to the ADD UNIQUE
> code, but it doesn't work. Viewing the system catalogs and '\d' both show
> the indices as primary, but the SearchSysCache funtion believes that they
> are not.

Doesn't make any sense to me either. Want to post your code?

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: Beta time at 2001-09-18 02:44:44 from Christopher Kings-Lynne

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arne Weiner 2001-09-18 06:47:44 Re: CVS access problem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-09-18 03:17:54 Re: Putting timestamps in PostgreSQL log