| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson |
| Date: | 2021-10-20 01:10:02 |
| Message-ID: | 2094982.1634692202@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I wish we had a bit more consistency in the flags, so we could centralize
> them. Seems there's no reason to not use -p -p and -b everywhere?
I don't think we care enough about performance of most of the scanners
to make them all backup-free, so -1 to that idea.
We could possibly replace the command line switches with %option
entries in the files themselves. But I think the reason we haven't
done so for -b is that the Makefile still needs to know about it
so as to know what to do with the lex.backup output file.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-10-20 01:26:53 | Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2021-10-20 01:08:59 | Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson |