| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson |
| Date: | 2021-10-20 00:31:22 |
| Message-ID: | 20211020003122.76lerm34nosgouev@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2021-10-19 17:57:31 -0400, John Naylor wrote:
> I know this is still in the evaluation stage, but I did notice some
> discrepencies in the Flex flags. With the attached patch, the read-only
> data segment seems to match up pretty well now.
Good catch. I think I just copied them around...
I wish we had a bit more consistency in the flags, so we could centralize
them. Seems there's no reason to not use -p -p and -b everywhere?
I also need to make meson use our flex wrapper for the relevant versions... I
can see the warning that'd be fixed by it on macos CI. Will do that and push
it out to my github repo together with your changes.
Thanks!
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2021-10-20 01:08:59 | Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-10-20 00:27:40 | Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing |