| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Hugo <Nabble>" <hugo(dot)tech(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump and thousands of schemas |
| Date: | 2012-05-25 14:41:23 |
| Message-ID: | 20887.1337956883@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
"Hugo <Nabble>" <hugo(dot)tech(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> If anyone has more suggestions, I would like to hear them. Thank you!
Provide a test case?
We recently fixed a couple of O(N^2) loops in pg_dump, but those covered
extremely specific cases that might or might not have anything to do
with what you're seeing. The complainant was extremely helpful about
tracking down the problems:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2012-03/msg00957.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2012-03/msg00225.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2012-03/msg00230.php
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-05-25 14:51:21 | Re: pg_stat_statements temporary file |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-05-25 14:39:24 | Re: [PATCH] Make skipped sort explicit in EXPLAIN ANALYZE |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig James | 2012-05-25 15:04:18 | Re: Maximum number of sequences that can be created |
| Previous Message | Greg Spiegelberg | 2012-05-25 11:58:38 | Re: Maximum number of sequences that can be created |