Re: Proposal: allow installation of any contrib module

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, nikolay(at)samokhvalov(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: allow installation of any contrib module
Date: 2007-01-25 17:11:39
Message-ID: 20792.1169745099@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
> I would like to see pgcrypto (or at least some of it's functionality) in
> core.

I believe the reason we keep it separate is so that people can easily
make crypto-free versions of PG for use in countries where encryption
capability is considered subject to arms regulations. Not sure how
important that case really is today, but it was a big consideration
last time this was discussed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-01-25 17:12:12 Re: Recursive Queries
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2007-01-25 17:06:33 Re: Proposal: allow installation of any contrib module