Re: postmaster.pid

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postmaster.pid
Date: 2003-01-21 15:07:42
Message-ID: 2068.1043161662@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Also, the fact that you even had to mention two different ways of doing
>> it is prima facie evidence that there are portability issues...

> Well, that doesn't necessarily follow, but even if it did, we have
> autoconf, we can very easily select a method as appropriate based on
> the results of testing the platform from within configure (I mean,
> what else is autoconf really for?).

True. Probably we could combine it with the old logic as a fallback.
Are you volunteering to do the work?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message George.T.Essig 2003-01-21 15:09:12 Re: Good (introductory) book
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-01-21 14:37:31 Re: Fw: configure error with krb5