| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list |
| Date: | 2010-11-24 16:34:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20327.1290616477@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> It *will* be manifestly harder to use if users have to spell the
>> argument types just so. Consider int4 versus integer, varchar versus
>> character varying (and not character varying(N)), etc etc. I think
>> that leaving out the argument types is something we should very strongly
>> consider here.
> I don't see why this is an either/or question. Can't we make them optional?
That might work.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Maciek Sakrejda | 2010-11-24 17:02:27 | Re: [JDBC] JDBC and Binary protocol error, for some statements |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-11-24 16:33:47 | Re: profiling connection overhead |