| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | assam258(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com, zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com, sjjang112233(at)gmail(dot)com, vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org, er(at)xs4all(dot)nl, jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com, peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org, li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Row pattern recognition |
| Date: | 2026-09-08 07:18:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20260908.161826.431346548851592287.ishii@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Henson,
> Hi Tatsuo,
>
>> So my plan for v52 is, using PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY
>> for "pattern" as below. Does this work for you?
>
> Yes, I think that works.
>
> Another way is to have the Assert read winstate->rpPattern in place
> of the local:
>
> Assert(elem->next >= 0 &&
> elem->next < winstate->rpPattern->numElements);
>
> Either is fine. 2013 in the increment removes the local, so the two
> end up at the same place.
Thanks for confirmation. I will go for PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY.
Regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2026-09-08 07:25:25 | Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) doesn't handle invalid indexes |
| Previous Message | Antonin Houska | 2026-09-08 07:17:31 | Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) backend waits indefinitely when decoding worker fails to start |