| From: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michail Nikolaev <michail(dot)nikolaev(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [SP-]GiST IOS visibility bug (was: Why doens't GiST require super-exclusive lock) |
| Date: | 2026-02-03 22:39:20 |
| Message-ID: | 202602032236.3kvssyb3duyu@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Apr-25, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the original thread [0] we established that GIST and SP-GiST
> support index-only scans, but don't have sufficient interlocking to
> prevent dead tuples from being revived for their scan by vacuum.
Hello,
This commitfest entry
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5721/
is stale. I would have brought it forward because it's tagged as a bug
fix, but the patches look a bit intimidating to consider it a
backpatchable bug fix. So, what's the status here?
Thanks
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2026-02-03 22:40:26 | Re: PostgreSQL 19 on AIX? |
| Previous Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2026-02-03 22:35:42 | Re: Orphaned users in PG16 and above can only be managed by Superusers |