Re: Some cleanup of pg_stat_statements tests

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Some cleanup of pg_stat_statements tests
Date: 2026-01-20 12:36:47
Message-ID: 202601201236.phfzenkxh4qi@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2026-Jan-20, Michael Paquier wrote:

> While looking at this area of the code, I have noticed that the new
> "squashing" test is not consistent with the rest of the test suite,
> re-creating the extension for nothing.
>
> The structure of the test is to have the "cleanup" phase second to
> last, so as there is no need to create multiple times the extensions.

Huh, yeah, agreed on this change.

> In passing, I'd like to suggest that REGRESS in the Makefile uses one
> item per line, to minimize diffs when we add new stuff.

Absolutely.

> Any thoughts or objections about the attached?

No objections here.

--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Java is clearly an example of money oriented programming" (A. Stepanov)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2026-01-20 12:48:44 Re: Patch: dumping tables data in multiple chunks in pg_dump
Previous Message Ajit Awekar 2026-01-20 12:31:21 Re: Periodic authorization expiration checks using GoAway message