Re: Docs pg_restore: Shouldn't there be a note about -n ?

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
To: Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Docs pg_restore: Shouldn't there be a note about -n ?
Date: 2025-10-25 16:32:30
Message-ID: 202510251627.jlbqh4qzgvnr@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2024-Sep-26, Florents Tselai wrote:

> Attached an idea.
> The A/B example may be wordy / redundant,

Yeah, it seems a little wordy to me, how about something like the
attached?

> but the -e note on the distinction between installing binaries / creating
> an extension I think it's important.

Hmm, ok, but I think that's a slightly unrelated topic because the shlib
is not a database object. Maybe it would be more appropriate to add a
mention of this directly in the docs for -e instead of trying to cram it
in the note about other database objects. I'll wait for you to propose
something for that part.

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Add-note-to-pg_dump-pg_restore-pages.patch text/x-diff 4.9 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Jacobson 2025-10-25 18:01:56 Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY bug: VACUUM sets frozenxid past a xid in async queue
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-10-25 16:20:28 Re: Instability of phycodorus in pg_upgrade tests with JIT