Re: Instability of phycodorus in pg_upgrade tests with JIT

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Instability of phycodorus in pg_upgrade tests with JIT
Date: 2025-10-25 16:20:28
Message-ID: 1983160.1761409228@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 25.10.2025 00:31, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The other side of that coin is that no other LLVM-using animal is
>> showing similar instability.

> My collection [2] contains also reports from other animals: petalura,
> desmoxytes, dragonet.

Hmm ... but none of those are running any LLVM newer than 4.0.1
(obsolete since 2017).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Álvaro Herrera 2025-10-25 16:32:30 Re: Docs pg_restore: Shouldn't there be a note about -n ?
Previous Message Alexander Lakhin 2025-10-25 16:00:00 Re: Instability of phycodorus in pg_upgrade tests with JIT