Re: back-patch documentation for age() and mxid_age()

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: back-patch documentation for age() and mxid_age()
Date: 2025-07-01 10:54:41
Message-ID: 202507011054.fxzwohnzyu6p@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2025-Jun-30, Nathan Bossart wrote:

> These functions have been around for a while, but commits 48b5aa3 and
> 15afb7d were only back-patched to v16. Any objections if I apply them
> down to v13 now?

None here.

--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"I'm impressed how quickly you are fixing this obscure issue. I came from
MS SQL and it would be hard for me to put into words how much of a better job
you all are doing on [PostgreSQL]."
Steve Midgley, http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2008-08/msg00000.php

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2025-07-01 11:03:11 Re: Adding error messages to a few slash commands
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2025-07-01 10:52:55 Re: Report bytes and transactions actually sent downtream