| From: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pawel(dot)szymczyk90(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Missing word |
| Date: | 2025-05-15 17:52:13 |
| Message-ID: | 202505151752.gnensinzclls@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 2025-May-13, Tom Lane wrote:
> PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > In the paragraph:
> > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/ddl-partitioning.html#DDL-PARTITIONING-DECLARATIVE-MAINTENANCE,
> > sentence "Another option that is often preferable is to remove the partition
> > from the partitioned table but retain access to it as a table in its own
> > right." there is missing "not" word. Correct form of this sentence should
> > be: Another option that is often preferable is to not remove the partition
> > from the partitioned table but retain access to it as a table in its own
> > right.
>
> AFAICS, it's correct as written.
Yeah, but maybe it would be clearer if the word "remove" were "detach".
I don't find the phrase "remove the partition from the partitioned
table" particulary suggestive of what's being described.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Para tener más hay que desear menos"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2025-05-15 18:12:54 | reindex documentation |
| Previous Message | Tonny Hawk | 2025-05-15 07:32:35 | Re: Changes in CREATE EXTENSION from being an extension to statement |