| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pawel(dot)szymczyk90(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Missing word |
| Date: | 2025-05-15 18:28:08 |
| Message-ID: | 12225.1747333688@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> writes:
> On 2025-May-13, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> "Another option that is often preferable is to remove the partition
>>> from the partitioned table but retain access to it as a table in its own
>>> right."
>> AFAICS, it's correct as written.
> Yeah, but maybe it would be clearer if the word "remove" were "detach".
> I don't find the phrase "remove the partition from the partitioned
> table" particulary suggestive of what's being described.
Hm, maybe, but would that be putting too much emphasis on "detach" because
it's the command keyword?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Paweł Szymczyk | 2025-05-15 21:12:05 | Re: Missing word |
| Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2025-05-15 18:12:54 | reindex documentation |