| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: --sync-method isn't documented to take an argument |
| Date: | 2023-10-04 19:50:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20231004195059.GA102574@nathanxps13 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 12:24:36PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> In any case, trying to standardize this looks like it would be a
> huge amount of churn for very little gain. I'd recommend making
> your markup look similar to what's immediately adjacent, if possible,
> and not sweating too much otherwise.
I matched the adjacent options as you suggested. Perhaps unsurprisingly,
the inclusion of class="parameter" is not the only inconsistency. I also
found that pg_upgrade adds the </option> before the argument name!
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Jones | 2023-10-04 20:03:38 | Add annotation syntax to pg_hba.conf entries |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2023-10-04 19:33:27 | Re: trying again to get incremental backup |