Re: Ignore 2PC transaction GIDs in query jumbling

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Ignore 2PC transaction GIDs in query jumbling
Date: 2023-08-01 02:46:58
Message-ID: 20230801024658.m4yojx4avfquylnh@jrouhaud
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 11:37:49AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 10:22:09AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > Looking at the rest of the ignored patterns, the only remaining one would be
> > DEALLOCATE, which AFAICS doesn't have a query_jumble_ignore tag for now.
>
> This one seems to be simple as well with a location field, looking
> quickly at its Node.

Agreed, it should be as trivial to implement as for the 2pc commands :)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiro Ikeda 2023-08-01 02:51:35 Re: Support to define custom wait events for extensions
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-08-01 02:37:49 Re: Ignore 2PC transaction GIDs in query jumbling