Re: recovery modules

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: recovery modules
Date: 2023-02-17 22:32:43
Message-ID: 20230217223243.GA3217365@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 05:01:47PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> All that had better
> be put into their own threads, IMO, to bring more visibility on these
> subjects.

I created a new thread for these [0].

> Saying that, I have spent more time on the revamped version of the
> archive modules and it was already doing a lot, so I have applied
> it as it covered all the points discussed..

Thanks!

[0] https://postgr.es/m/20230217215624.GA3131134%40nathanxps13

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2023-02-17 22:35:30 Re: DDL result is lost by CREATE DATABASE with WAL_LOG strategy
Previous Message Nikolay Samokhvalov 2023-02-17 22:24:13 Re: [PATCH] Add pretty-printed XML output option