Re: Decoupling antiwraparound autovacuum from special rules around auto cancellation

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Decoupling antiwraparound autovacuum from special rules around auto cancellation
Date: 2023-01-22 02:54:35
Message-ID: 20230122025435.7lguyibkif3vtlps@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2023-01-21 18:37:59 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:02 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > I think with a bit of polish "Add autovacuum trigger instrumentation." ought
> > to be quickly mergeable.
>
> Any thoughts on v5-0001-*?
>
> It would be nice to get the uncontentious part of all this (which is
> the instrumentation patch) out of the way soon.

Is https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAH2-WzmytCuSpaMEhv8H-jt8x_9whTi0T5bjNbH2gvaR0an2Pw%40mail.gmail.com
the last / relevant version of the patch to look at?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Coleman 2023-01-22 03:07:58 Re: Parallelize correlated subqueries that execute within each worker
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-01-22 02:37:59 Re: Decoupling antiwraparound autovacuum from special rules around auto cancellation