Re: Using AF_UNIX sockets always for tests on Windows

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Using AF_UNIX sockets always for tests on Windows
Date: 2022-12-02 01:42:25
Message-ID: 20221202014225.bzyyevrybcqjv3ks@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-12-01 20:30:36 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Commit f5580882 established that all supported computers have AF_UNIX.
> > One of the follow-up consequences that was left unfinished is that we
> > could simplify our test harness code to make it the same on all
> > platforms. Currently we have hundreds of lines of C and perl to use
> > secure TCP connections instead for the benefit of defunct Windows
> > versions. Here's a patch set for that.
>
> If we remove that, won't we have a whole lot of code that's not
> tested at all on any platform, ie all the TCP-socket code?

There's some coverage via the auth and ssl tests. But I agree it's an
issue. But to me the fix for that seems to be to add a dedicated test for
that, rather than relying on windows to test our socket code - that's quite a
few separate code paths from the tcp support of other platforms.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2022-12-02 01:47:55 Re: Prefetch the next tuple's memory during seqscans
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-12-02 01:40:22 Re: Using WaitEventSet in the postmaster