Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE
Date: 2022-11-15 21:14:16
Message-ID: 20221115211416.GB96764@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:07:06PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> If anyone else wants to comment, or if either of those people want to
> comment further, please speak up soon. Otherwise, I am going to press
> forward with committing this.

I don't think I have any further thoughts about the approach, so I won't
balk if you proceed with this change. It might be worth starting a new
thread to discuss whether to treat predefined roles as a special case, but
IMO that needn't hold up this patch.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-11-15 21:51:03 Re: archive modules
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-11-15 21:08:35 Re: meson oddities