| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Splitting up guc.c |
| Date: | 2022-09-13 09:10:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20220913091000.l4dam6w5euja3pua@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-Sep-12, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, I suspect people will have to manually reapply any changes in
> the GUC tables to guc_tables.c. That'll be the same amount of work
> for them whenever we commit this patch (unless theirs lands first,
> in which case I have to deal with it). The issue I think is
> whether it's politer to make that happen during a CF or between
> CFs.
Personally I would prefer that this kind of thing is done quickly rather
than delay it to some uncertain future. That way I can deal with it
straight ahead rather than living with the anxiety that it will land
later and I will have to deal with it then. I see no benefit in
waiting.
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Naylor | 2022-09-13 09:22:58 | Re: broken table formatting in psql |
| Previous Message | Nikita Malakhov | 2022-09-13 08:47:16 | Re: Tuples inserted and deleted by the same transaction |