Re: Add tracking of backend memory allocated to pg_stat_activity

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: reid(dot)thompson(at)crunchydata(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add tracking of backend memory allocated to pg_stat_activity
Date: 2022-09-07 08:17:30
Message-ID: 20220907.171730.70660004495346027.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Wed, 07 Sep 2022 17:08:41 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> At Tue, 06 Sep 2022 17:10:49 -0400, Reid Thompson <reid(dot)thompson(at)crunchydata(dot)com> wrote in
> > On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 13:43 +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > >
> > > > @@ -916,6 +930,7 @@ AllocSetAlloc(MemoryContext context, Size size)
> > > >    return NULL;
> > > >  
> > > >    context->mem_allocated += blksize;
> > > > + pgstat_report_backend_mem_allocated_increase(blksi
> > > > ze);
> > >
> > > I'm not sure this is acceptable. The function adds a branch even when
> > > the feature is turned off, which I think may cause a certain extent
> > > of
> > > performance degradation. A past threads [1], [2] and [3] might be
> > > informative.
> >
> > Stated above is '...even when the feature is turned off...', I want to
> > note that this feature/patch (for tracking memory allocated) doesn't
> > have an 'on/off'. Tracking would always occur.
>
> In the patch, I see that
> pgstat_report_backend_mem_allocated_increase() runs the following
> code, which seems like to me to be a branch..

Ah.. sorry.

> pgstat_report_backend_mem_allocated_increase() runs the following
- code, which seems like to me to be a branch..
+ code, which seems like to me to be a branch that can turn of the feature..

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-09-07 08:35:58 Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v12
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2022-09-07 08:09:14 Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup