Re: Tracking last scan time

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tracking last scan time
Date: 2022-08-31 18:56:29
Message-ID: 20220831185629.mrr2jlwjubsy2pvi@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-08-31 19:52:49 +0200, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> As for having a lower granularity and preventing the
> one-syscall-per-Relation issue, can't we reuse the query_start or
> state_change timestamps that appear in pg_stat_activity (potentially
> updated immediately before this stat flush), or some other per-backend
> timestamp that is already maintained and considered accurate enough
> for this use?

The problem is that it won't change at all for a query that runs for a week -
and we'll report the timestamp from a week ago when it finally ends.

But given this is done when stats are flushed, which only happens after the
transaction ended, we can just use GetCurrentTransactionStopTimestamp() - if
we got to flushing the transaction stats we'll already have computed that.

> tabentry->numscans += lstats->t_counts.t_numscans;
> + if (pgstat_track_scans && lstats->t_counts.t_numscans)
> + tabentry->lastscan = GetCurrentTimestamp();

Besides replacing GetCurrentTimestamp() with
GetCurrentTransactionStopTimestamp(), this should then also check if
tabentry->lastscan is already newer than the new timestamp.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-08-31 19:06:04 Re: [PATCH] Query Jumbling for CALL and SET utility statements
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-08-31 18:45:58 Re: SQL/JSON features for v15