| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: moving basebackup code to its own directory |
| Date: | 2022-08-10 16:57:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20220810165734.bah55lodfmqgfbqa@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-Aug-10, Robert Haas wrote:
> David Steele voted for back-patching this on the grounds that it would
> make future back-patching easier, which is an argument that seems to
> me to have some merit, although on the other hand, we are already into
> August so it's quite late in the day. Anyone else want to vote?
Given that 10 of these 11 files are new in 15, I definitely agree with
backpatching the move.
Moving the include/ files is going to cause some pain for any
third-party code #including those files. I don't think this is a
problem.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2022-08-10 17:19:01 | Re: [PATCH] CF app: add "Returned: Needs more interest" |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-08-10 16:56:29 | Re: designated initializers |