| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v70 |
| Date: | 2022-08-09 16:40:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20220809164046.33vxhj6eeel2q3tq@awork3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-08-09 12:18:47 +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> What do you think about adding a function in core PG to provide such
> functionality? (means being able to retrieve all the stats (+ eventually add
> some filtering) without the need to connect to each database).
I'm not that convinced by the use case, but I think it's also low cost to add
and maintain, so if somebody cares enough to write something...
The only thing I would "request" is that such a function requires more
permissions than the default accessors do. I think it's a minor problem that
we allow so much access within a database right now, regardless of object
permissions, but it'd not be a great idea to expand that to other databases,
in bulk?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Steele | 2022-08-09 16:41:28 | Re: moving basebackup code to its own directory |
| Previous Message | David Steele | 2022-08-09 16:35:58 | Re: moving basebackup code to its own directory |