| From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | david(at)pgmasters(dot)net, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: remove more archiving overhead |
| Date: | 2022-07-08 01:56:52 |
| Message-ID: | 20220708.105652.1551158050191356887.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Thu, 7 Jul 2022 15:07:16 -0700, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> Here's an updated patch.
Thinking RFC'ish, the meaning of "may" and "must" is significant in
this description. On the other hand it uses both "may" and "can" but
I thinkthat their difference is not significant or "can" there is
somewhat confusing. I think the "can" should be "may" here.
And since "must" is emphasized, doesn't "may" also needs emphasis?
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yugo NAGATA | 2022-07-08 02:07:44 | Re: Add a test for "cannot truncate foreign table" |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2022-07-08 01:14:25 | Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns |