Re: Implicitly created operator family not listed by pg_event_trigger_ddl_commands

On 2022-May-20, Masahiko Sawada wrote:

> I got the failure when testing in 13:
>
> @@ -429,8 +429,6 @@
> -- CREATE OPERATOR CLASS without FAMILY clause should report
> -- both CREATE OPERATOR FAMILY and CREATE OPERATOR CLASS
> CREATE OPERATOR CLASS evttrigopclass FOR TYPE int USING btree AS STORAGE int;
> -NOTICE: END: command_tag=CREATE OPERATOR FAMILY type=operator family
> identity=public.evttrigopclass USING btree
> -NOTICE: END: command_tag=CREATE OPERATOR CLASS type=operator class
> identity=public.evttrigopclass USING btree
> DROP EVENT TRIGGER regress_event_trigger_report_dropped;
> -- only allowed from within an event trigger function, should fail
> select pg_event_trigger_table_rewrite_oid();
>
> I think that the event trigger that emits these NOTICE messages
> doesn't exist in 13 or older branches. It was added by 2d689babe3c.

Oh, hahah. Hmm, I feel inclined to add the trigger rather than remove
the lines from the expected output.

--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"La rebeldía es la virtud original del hombre" (Arthur Schopenhauer)