From: | Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, r(dot)takahashi_2(at)fujitsu(dot)com, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance |
Date: | 2022-04-28 06:40:11 |
Message-ID: | 20220428154011.871015d8e0626d79c65e2c5f@sraoss.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Greg,
On Sat, 23 Apr 2022 08:18:01 +0200
Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out how to get this feature more attention. Everyone
> agrees it would be a huge help but it's a scary patch to review.
>
> I wonder if it would be helpful to have a kind of "readers guide"
> explanation of the patches to help a reviewer understand what the point of
> each patch is and how the whole system works? I think Andres and Robert
> have both taken that approach before with big patches and it really helped
> imho.
Thank you very much for your suggestion!
Following your advice, I am going to write a readers guide referring to the past
posts of Andres and Rebert.
Regards,
Yugo Nagata
--
Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2022-04-28 06:48:36 | Re: Multi-Master Logical Replication |
Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2022-04-28 06:32:46 | Re: Defer selection of asynchronous subplans until the executor initialization stage |