Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance

From: Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, r(dot)takahashi_2(at)fujitsu(dot)com, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance
Date: 2022-04-28 06:40:11
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Greg,

On Sat, 23 Apr 2022 08:18:01 +0200
Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:

> I'm trying to figure out how to get this feature more attention. Everyone
> agrees it would be a huge help but it's a scary patch to review.
> I wonder if it would be helpful to have a kind of "readers guide"
> explanation of the patches to help a reviewer understand what the point of
> each patch is and how the whole system works? I think Andres and Robert
> have both taken that approach before with big patches and it really helped
> imho.

Thank you very much for your suggestion!

Following your advice, I am going to write a readers guide referring to the past
posts of Andres and Rebert.

Yugo Nagata

Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2022-04-28 06:48:36 Re: Multi-Master Logical Replication
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2022-04-28 06:32:46 Re: Defer selection of asynchronous subplans until the executor initialization stage