Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set
Date: 2022-03-31 05:36:16
Message-ID: 20220331053616.u446wsr732quuzer@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2022-03-31 01:00:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> How well does this patch work with pre-14 buildfarm clients?

Looks to me like it'll just run the test twice, once via TestUpgrade, once via
taptest. It's possible that there could be trouble somehow due to duplicated
log files or something?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2022-03-31 05:37:07 Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-03-31 05:25:17 Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set